ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
G. C. Pomraning
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 136 | Number 1 | September 2000 | Pages 1-14
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE00-A2144
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We consider the energy-dependent pencil beam problem for a thin slab with screened Rutherford scattering. Under certain approximations, this problem can be reduced to a monoenergetic problem with an effective depth-dependent scattering cross section [overbar]s(z). The z dependence of this cross section arises from the explicit z dependence of the true scattering cross section s(z,E), as well as from an induced z dependence associated with the energy dependence of s(z,E). Prior work led to a quadrature result for the scalar flux in the special case that [overbar]s is a constant, independent of z. In this paper, we generalize this result by allowing [overbar]s(z) to have an arbitrary z dependence. We use these considerations to show that simple homogenization, namely, replacing [overbar]s(z) by its average over the slab, can lead to significant errors in the scalar flux. A more detailed homogenization algorithm is suggested, involving an effective screening parameter in the screened Rutherford scattering phase function, as well as an effective depth coordinate z.