ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
H. Tellier
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 79 | Number 4 | December 1981 | Pages 393-403
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE81-A21390
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Until now, there has been a discrepancy between the computed and the measured values of the 238U effective capture integral. The former has always been greater than the latter. For this reason, the reactor physicists have used an adjustment of the computed value. At the present time, the accuracy of the cross-section knowledge has increased, and the reactor computation codes are almost exact. Such an adjustment, therefore, is no longer justified. Recently, several new measurements of the resonance parameters were carried out and the use of a multilevel formalism was suggested to compute the 238U cross sections. This paper shows that the simultaneous use of recent parameters and the Reich-Moore formalism explain the discrepancy. For thermal neutron reactors, and depending on the neutron spectrum hardness, between one-half and two-thirds of this discrepancy is explained by the neutron data and the remainder by the multilevel formalism. This last effect is not negligible. We have done similar studies for 232Th, but in this latter case the multilevel effect was found to be much smaller than for the 238U and can be neglected in most applications.