ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
J. V. Muralidhar Rao, S. M. Lee, M. L. Sharma
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 76 | Number 3 | December 1980 | Pages 351-356
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE80-A21326
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Within the framework of the Abajan, Bazazjantz, Bondarenko, and Nikolaev (ABBN) shielding factor approach, several methods have been proposed in the past for the treatment of resonance shielding of multigroup cross sections in heterogeneous cells of fast reactor lattices. First, the approximations made in the different methods and their interrelationship is briefly reviewed. Then, three recent efficient methods proposed by Bitelli et al., by Tone, and by Kujawski and Protsik are numerically compared by checking against exact fine-group collision probability calculations. It is found that the method of Bitelli et al. may give erroneous results, while the methods of Tone and of Kujawski and Protsik show satisfactory agreement with the exact calculations.