ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
D. V. Gopinath, A. Natarajan, V. Sundararaman
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 75 | Number 2 | August 1980 | Pages 181-184
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE80-A21307
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the anisotropic source flux iteration technique for solving the radiation transport problems for evaluating the flux integral, the source within the mesh was approximated to a linear form using the nodal source values. It is shown in this Note that at the start of each iteration, in addition to the nodal sources, the source integral over the mesh is also available. Using the source integral as an additional parameter, several linear approximations and a quadratic approximation for the source distribution within the mesh are possible. This Note discusses the relative merits of the various approximations. A comparative analysis of these approximations with the different difference schemes currently in use is also given. Among the linear schemes, the ones retaining the source integral and the gradient or source integral and the terminal nodal source provide very good accuracy. It is also shown that the quadratic scheme retaining both the nodal sources and the source integral provide far more accurate results without significant increase in computer time or memory.