ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
V. V. Verbinski, C. G. Cassapakis, W. K. Hagan, G. L. Simmons
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 75 | Number 2 | August 1980 | Pages 159-166
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE80-A21305
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The importance of gamma-ray reactions [(γ,f), (γ,γ′), and (γ,n)] that can interfere with the detection of certain threshold neutron reactions [(n,f), (n,n′), and (n,2n)] used in reactor pressure vessel dosimetry was studied via a combined experimental and calculational program. First, an experiment-design calculation of such photocontamination was carried out in a pool-type reactor, indicating ∼0.1% photointerference at the reactor surface and ∼10 000% at 1-m penetration of water (∼1% neutron attenuation/mm). Next, a complete set of threshold activation foils was irradiated fore and aft of a “photofraction gauge,” a tungsten disk that attenuated the important 5- to 10-MeV gamma rays by a factor of ∼30 and the >0.5-MeV neutrons by a factor of ∼3. The photofraction gauge was calibrated for photofraction fγ, by comparing the large fore to aft activation ratios [R(F/A)] for photocontamination foils with R(F/A) ≃ 3 for noncontamination foils [such as 58Ni(n,p) and 27Al(n,α)]. The values of fγ were calculated and were found to agree reasonably well with those measured, except that the calculated values were a bit too high. The one-dimensional calculation needs to be replaced with an accurate three-dimensional calculation with measured power distribution before accurate (γ,f) and (γ,γ′) cross-section adjustments can be made for the activation foils and/or the gamma-ray production cross sections (from n,γ reactions near the reactor) properly modified. Some one-dimensional cylindrical calculations for pressurized and boiling water reactors are presented that predict up to 55% photocontamination at the pressure vessel wall when determined by the 232Th(n,f) reaction.