ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
W. Reed Johnson, Daniel H. Risher, James E. Rogers, William L. Thompson
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 43 | Number 1 | January 1971 | Pages 32-41
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE71-A21243
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Well-collimated beams of thermal-neutron-capture gamma rays from titanium and nickel, having average energies of about 6 and 8 MeV, respectively, were used to measure narrow-beam and total gamma-ray dose attenuation. Slab shields of lead, iron, and concrete were investigated for normal and oblique beam incidence. Total dose measurements were made by traversing an exposure-responsive detector through a plane behind and parallel to the shield. Monte Carlo and moments-method calculations were used to compare analytical and experimental total dose results. Good agreement was found for iron and concrete shields, but experimental results for the lead shield were higher than those predicted by the moments method by a factor of ∼1.2 for 6 MeV and ∼1.5 for 8 MeV. The reason for this disagreement is believed to be primarily bremsstrah-lung produced by energetic secondary electrons slowing down in lead.