ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
IAEA program uses radioisotopes to protect rhinos
After two years of testing, the International Atomic Energy Agency and the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, have begun officially implementing the Rhisotope Project, an innovative effort to combat rhino poaching and trafficking by leveraging nuclear technology.
R. G. Alsmiller, Jr., T. W. Armstrong, W. A. Coleman
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 42 | Number 3 | December 1970 | Pages 367-381
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A21224
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Nucleon-meson cascade calculations have been carried out for monoenergetic neutrons (60 to 3000 MeV) and protons (400 to 3000 MeV) normally incident on a semi-infinite slab of tissue 30 cm thick, and the absorbed dose and dose equivalent as a function of depth in the tissue are presented. The calculated absorbed doses from 180- and 525-MeV incident neutrons and 660- and 730-MeV protons are compared with experimental data. For 525-MeV incident neutrons, the experimental and calculated absorbed doses are in good agreement, but this is not the case with the other comparisons.