ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
V. J. Orphan, C. G. Hoot, Joseph John
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 42 | Number 3 | December 1970 | Pages 352-366
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A21223
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Gamma-ray production cross sections were measured for the 16O(n, xγ) reaction from 6.35- to 16.52-MeV neutron energy. The Gulf General Atomic LINAC was used to produce a pulsed source of neutrons having a continuous distribution of neutron energies. A 30-cm3 Ge(Li) detector, placed at 125 deg to the incident neutron beam, was used to measure the γ-ray spectra. The corresponding neutron energy was determined by the time-of-flight technique. The two-parameter data (γ-ray energy, neutron energy) were processed with an on-line computer and sorted into 10 γ-ray spectra spanning the range 6.35 MeV ≤ En ≤ 16.52 MeV. From these data we obtained average differential gamma-ray production cross sections for 9 gamma rays from the 16O(n, xγ) reaction. The cross sections are in good agreement with other recent measurements, but show rather large disagreement with some earlier measurements. The total nonelastic cross section obtained by summing the partial cross sections is consistent with the nonelastic cross section obtained from the difference between the total cross section and the total elastic cross section for En < H MeV. However, in the range 11 MeV ≤ En ≤ 16.5 MeV, there is a serious discrepancy for which a possible explanation is discussed.