ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
V. J. Orphan, C. G. Hoot, Joseph John
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 42 | Number 3 | December 1970 | Pages 352-366
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A21223
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Gamma-ray production cross sections were measured for the 16O(n, xγ) reaction from 6.35- to 16.52-MeV neutron energy. The Gulf General Atomic LINAC was used to produce a pulsed source of neutrons having a continuous distribution of neutron energies. A 30-cm3 Ge(Li) detector, placed at 125 deg to the incident neutron beam, was used to measure the γ-ray spectra. The corresponding neutron energy was determined by the time-of-flight technique. The two-parameter data (γ-ray energy, neutron energy) were processed with an on-line computer and sorted into 10 γ-ray spectra spanning the range 6.35 MeV ≤ En ≤ 16.52 MeV. From these data we obtained average differential gamma-ray production cross sections for 9 gamma rays from the 16O(n, xγ) reaction. The cross sections are in good agreement with other recent measurements, but show rather large disagreement with some earlier measurements. The total nonelastic cross section obtained by summing the partial cross sections is consistent with the nonelastic cross section obtained from the difference between the total cross section and the total elastic cross section for En < H MeV. However, in the range 11 MeV ≤ En ≤ 16.5 MeV, there is a serious discrepancy for which a possible explanation is discussed.