ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
V. J. Orphan, C. G. Hoot, Joseph John
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 42 | Number 3 | December 1970 | Pages 352-366
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A21223
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Gamma-ray production cross sections were measured for the 16O(n, xγ) reaction from 6.35- to 16.52-MeV neutron energy. The Gulf General Atomic LINAC was used to produce a pulsed source of neutrons having a continuous distribution of neutron energies. A 30-cm3 Ge(Li) detector, placed at 125 deg to the incident neutron beam, was used to measure the γ-ray spectra. The corresponding neutron energy was determined by the time-of-flight technique. The two-parameter data (γ-ray energy, neutron energy) were processed with an on-line computer and sorted into 10 γ-ray spectra spanning the range 6.35 MeV ≤ En ≤ 16.52 MeV. From these data we obtained average differential gamma-ray production cross sections for 9 gamma rays from the 16O(n, xγ) reaction. The cross sections are in good agreement with other recent measurements, but show rather large disagreement with some earlier measurements. The total nonelastic cross section obtained by summing the partial cross sections is consistent with the nonelastic cross section obtained from the difference between the total cross section and the total elastic cross section for En < H MeV. However, in the range 11 MeV ≤ En ≤ 16.5 MeV, there is a serious discrepancy for which a possible explanation is discussed.