ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
P. K. Doshi, George H. Miley
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 39 | Number 2 | February 1970 | Pages 182-192
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A21198
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A subcritical assembly (29 × 38 × 29 cm) built of TRIGA-type fuel elements was pulsed by coupling it with the Illinois TRIGA reactor through a graphite thermal column (2 ft square by 4 ft long). Flux measurements were made at seven locations in four different fuel loadings—9, 16, 25, and 49 fuel elements—with keff varying from ∼0.4 to 0.92. A polynomial expansion method is used to provide a continuous representation of pulse shapes. Derivatives appearing in a diffusion-theory model, evaluated using this expansion, are then used to determine the propagation velocity and the neutronic parameters. The maximum “asymptotic” velocity (removed from the boundaries) varied from ∼4 × 104 cm/sec at keff = 0.60 to 2.54 × 104 cm/sec at keff = 0.92. The theoretical model involves an expansion which, depending on the number of terms retained, bounds the experimental data. However, differences of as much as 40% in absolute values are observed and they are attributed to inadequacies in the model for this small heterogeneous assembly. Uncertainties in the neutronic parameters, as well as nonlinearities in the instrumentation, may also contribute.