ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
P. K. Doshi, George H. Miley
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 39 | Number 2 | February 1970 | Pages 182-192
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A21198
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A subcritical assembly (29 × 38 × 29 cm) built of TRIGA-type fuel elements was pulsed by coupling it with the Illinois TRIGA reactor through a graphite thermal column (2 ft square by 4 ft long). Flux measurements were made at seven locations in four different fuel loadings—9, 16, 25, and 49 fuel elements—with keff varying from ∼0.4 to 0.92. A polynomial expansion method is used to provide a continuous representation of pulse shapes. Derivatives appearing in a diffusion-theory model, evaluated using this expansion, are then used to determine the propagation velocity and the neutronic parameters. The maximum “asymptotic” velocity (removed from the boundaries) varied from ∼4 × 104 cm/sec at keff = 0.60 to 2.54 × 104 cm/sec at keff = 0.92. The theoretical model involves an expansion which, depending on the number of terms retained, bounds the experimental data. However, differences of as much as 40% in absolute values are observed and they are attributed to inadequacies in the model for this small heterogeneous assembly. Uncertainties in the neutronic parameters, as well as nonlinearities in the instrumentation, may also contribute.