ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Alan Staub, D. R. Harris, and Mark Goldsmith
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 34 | Number 3 | December 1968 | Pages 263-274
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE68-A21091
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A group of 11 aqueous critical experiments fueled by 233U and 235U and performed by Gwin and Magnuson have been analyzed to serve as integral tests of nuclear data important in reactor design. Measured eignvalues were corrected for various effects including the presence of the aluminum container, departures from sphericity, delayed-neutron importance, and room return. Eigenvalues were calculated in simplified P-3 approximation using 60 energy groups, and determinations were made of the eigenvalue uncertainties (±0.1%) associated with this treatment. Within the eigenvalue uncertainties (±0.25%) resulting from fuel inventories, it was concluded that fissile nuclide and H(n,γ) cross sections were adequate to match calculations and experiments but that there was evidence of erroneous nuclear data important in determining neutron leakage. In particular, a substantially harder 233U fission neutron spectrum seems to be indicated.