ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
W. Baer, J. Hardy, Jr., D. Klein, J. J. Volpe, B. L. Palowitch and F. S. Frantz, Jr.
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 23 | Number 4 | December 1965 | Pages 361-367
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A21073
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Parameter measurements in a 1.3% enriched UO2 lattice with H:U = 0.42 have been performed. These measurements are an extension of an experimental program in the TRX critical facility of the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory. Earlier measurements were made for a wide range of water-to-uranium (H2O:U) volume ratios (1:1 to 8:1) using 4-ft (1.2-m)-high slightly enriched, 0.387-in. (0.98-cm)-diam uranium metal or oxide fuel rods clad with aluminum. The new data have been compared with current analytic techniques, using both P-1 and P-3 multigroup analysis in the epithermal neutron energy range and Monte Carlo multigroup methods for thermal neutrons. This extremely undermoderated lattice provides a very stringent test for both the computational methods and the neutron cross sections used. The quantities measured were: the ratio of epithermal-to-thermal radiative captures in U238 (ρ28); the ratio of captures in U238 to fissions in U235 (the modified conversion ratio, CR*); the ratio of U238 fisions to U235 fissions (δ28); and the ratio of epithermal-to-thermal U235 fissions (δ25). In addition, activations were obtained with thermal-neutron detectors of widely different spectral response. The results indicate that the calculational methods predict the parameters very well, except for δ28. The discrepancy in δ28 may be due to inadequate U238 inelastic scattering cross sections, but this conclusion requires additional study. Monte Carlo calculations of thermal-neutron detector activations show that use of either the Nelkin or Koppel kernel gives results that agree with the data.