ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
April 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear Energy Strategy announced at CNA2026
At the Canadian Nuclear Association Conference (CNA2026) in Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson announced that Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is developing a new Nuclear Energy Strategy for the country. The strategy, which is slated to be released by the end of this year, will be based on four objectives: 1) enabling new nuclear builds across Canada, 2) being a global supplier and exporter of nuclear technology and services, 3) expanding uranium production and nuclear fuel opportunities, and 4) developing new Canadian nuclear innovations, including in both fission and fusion technologies.
K. Shure
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 19 | Number 3 | July 1964 | Pages 310-320
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE64-A20964
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutron penetration in water and in iron/water shields has been calculated using a P-3 multigroup program. The thermal-neutron flux from a point fission source in water obtained from calculation and experiment agree to within 18% in the region between 15 and 140 cm, covering more than 9 decades of attenuation. The calculated neutron spectrum compares favorably in shape and magnitude with moments-method results out to 120 cm of water. The observed variations of the thermal-neutron flux in an iron/water shield are predicted by the P-3 program. Some of the differences between experiment and the predicted thermal flux within a thick iron region are due to the single-energy-group treatment in the calculations. Uncertainties in the high-energy cross sections for iron are of sufficient magnitude to account for differences between calculation and experiment noted in the water region following iron.