ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
A. Galati
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 37 | Number 1 | July 1969 | Pages 30-40
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE69-A20896
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A quasi-static method is proposed for evaluating spatial effects on nuclear reactor kinetics. The neutron flux shape is calculated approximately as an asymptotic solution of the two-group space-time diffusion equations, where delayed neutron behavior is included. Two iterative procedures are alternatively used according to the amount of reactivity involved. The first one operates until prompt criticality is reached. The second procedure replaces the first one as soon as the reactor goes superpromptcritical. The main feature of the approach adopted is the possibility of selecting an initial guess such that convergence is reached at the first iteration. The matter is then reduced to solving two eigenvalue problems. Theoretical and numerical comparisons with Henry's adiabatic model outline the main role of perturbed adjoint fluxes and correct neutron-flux shape (the second agent only for superpromptcritical excursions) in defining the generation time and reactivity. When compared with the exact solution, results of sample problems show substantial accuracy in the flux shape and amplitude. In subpromptcritical excursions, only the synthesis method is as accurate as the metastatic one and yields errors of few percent at the flux peak. In the reactivity range above prompt critical, differences between the exact results and the metastatic ones are unessential.