ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
E. E. Bende, A. H. Hogenbirk, J. L. Kloosterman, H. van Dam
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 133 | Number 2 | October 1999 | Pages 147-162
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE99-A2078
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An analytical expression was derived for the average Dancoff factor of a fuel kernel (Cfk) in a pebble of a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor. This Dancoff factor accounts for the probability that a neutron escaping from a fuel kernel enters another fuel kernel, in the same pebble or in other pebbles, without colliding with a moderator nucleus in between. If the fuel zone of the pebble is thought to be of infinite dimensions, the Dancoff factor becomes equal to the so-called infinite-medium Dancoff factor Cfk. The Cfk has been determined by the evaluation of three existing analytical expressions and by two Monte Carlo calculations performed with the MCNP-4A code, for various coated-particle densities. The Dancoff factor Cfk can be written as Cfk times a correction factor. The latter has been calculated for different fuel zone radii and pebble shell thicknesses. For the standard pebble, Cfk as a function of the number of coated particles has been calculated both analytically and with MCNP. The results of both methods are in good agreement. The analytical calculation method is preferred because it consumes practically no CPU time and obviates the building of MCNP models.