ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
Amir N. Nahavandi, Richard F. Von Hollen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 22 | Number 4 | August 1965 | Pages 463-469
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A20633
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An analytical model for the prediction of steam-water critical-flow pressure, mass discharge and pressure gradients in the approach region to critical flow is presented. The continuity, momentum and energy equations are applied to successive differential elements along the conduit and are solved numerically on an IBM-7094 digital computer for the maximum discharge flow rate. The proposed model assumes thermal equilibrium conditions and employs the modified Armand correlation to relate the void fraction to steam quality. The frictional losses in the momentum equation are obtained by two methods: a separated flow model and Armand model. A comparison of the analytical predictions with available test results on small diameter pipes shows that: 1) the present model agrees with the published test data; and 2) both frictional loss models are equally valid, and the selection of a particular method depends on the degree of conservatism desired.