ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
Amir N. Nahavandi, Richard F. Von Hollen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 22 | Number 4 | August 1965 | Pages 463-469
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A20633
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An analytical model for the prediction of steam-water critical-flow pressure, mass discharge and pressure gradients in the approach region to critical flow is presented. The continuity, momentum and energy equations are applied to successive differential elements along the conduit and are solved numerically on an IBM-7094 digital computer for the maximum discharge flow rate. The proposed model assumes thermal equilibrium conditions and employs the modified Armand correlation to relate the void fraction to steam quality. The frictional losses in the momentum equation are obtained by two methods: a separated flow model and Armand model. A comparison of the analytical predictions with available test results on small diameter pipes shows that: 1) the present model agrees with the published test data; and 2) both frictional loss models are equally valid, and the selection of a particular method depends on the degree of conservatism desired.