ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Hiroshi Motoda
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 41 | Number 1 | July 1970 | Pages 1-13
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A20357
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A variational treatment of the burnup optimization of continuous scattered refueling is presented and numerical solutions are given for a slab reactor. It is made quantitatively clear how the reactor dimension, the xenon and the Doppler feedback reactivity, the burnup dependence of fission cross section and the reflector performance affect the power distribution that maximizes the average discharge exposure. Power flattening and burnup maximization are contradictory in general, but are consistent if, and only if, the condition of the perfect reflection at the core boundary is satisfied. The optimal power distribution is peaked in the central—and depleted in the outer region; and becomes flatter as the reflector performance is increased. The maximum average burnup depends on the burnup dependence of fission cross section and the strength of the Doppler and the xenon feedback reactivity, even if the average burnup calculated by the point-reactor model is the same. The former effect on the optimal power distribution is very small but the latter effects greatly contribute to power flattening. Both effects reduce the maximum burnup and the effects of the latter two are of comparable order. As the reactor becomes smaller, the maximum burnup decreases almost linearly to the neutron leakage. Optimal refueling has an advantage of more than 10% in the average burnup over the conventional flat-refueling rate method. However the difference from the flat-burnup method is very small, considering that the optimal refueling is handicapped by its very bad power distribution.