ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC proposes changes to its rules on nuclear materials
In response to Executive Order 14300, “Ordering the Reform of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,” the NRC is proposing sweeping changes to its rules governing the use of nuclear materials that are widely used in industry, medicine, and research. The changes would amend NRC regulations for the licensing of nuclear byproduct material, some source material, and some special nuclear material.
As published in the May 18 Federal Register, the NRC is seeking public comment on this proposed rule and draft interim guidance until July 2.
A. Dubi, Y. S. Horowitz, H. Rief
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 71 | Number 1 | July 1979 | Pages 29-45
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE79-A20327
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The mathematical validity of the track rotation estimator (TRE) as an unbiased point flux estimator is presented in detail. The mathematical formulation of the TRE is developed for the cases of spherical symmetry, spherically symmetrical media with nonisotropic source, and nonsymmetrical media. Various methods for biasing the angular distribution to obtain a bounded variance are developed. The results of calculations in which the TRE is applied to test problems—infinite media, sphere, and sphere with nonisotropic source—as well as a three-dimensional finite slab with point source are presented and compared with the uncollided flux (UCF) and the once-collided flux (OCF) estimators. The results indicate substantially superior quality factors for the TRE over the UCF and the OCF estimators, especially when the absorption cross section is small.