ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
T. A. Parish, W. S. Charlton, N. Shinohara, M. Andoh, M. C. Brady, S. Raman
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 131 | Number 2 | February 1999 | Pages 208-221
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE99-A2029
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Work performed in part for an American Nuclear Society Standards Committee Subgroup (ANS 19.9) to assess the status of delayed neutron data is summarized. Recent measurements of delayed neutron emission conducted at Texas A&M University are also described. During the last 10 yr, there have been advances in nuclear data libraries (e.g., improved fission product yields) that make it possible to quantitatively predict delayed neutron emission from basic data. The six-group delayed neutron data available in the literature from both macroscopic level experiments and microscopic level calculations for several actinide isotopes are compared. Results are also presented from recent experimental measurements of delayed neutron emission and delineates some of the relationships between these measurements and microscopic level predictions. For example, from the experimental measurements, Keepin's delayed neutron group 1 is shown to correspond mainly to a single isotope, 87Br, as expected from microscopic level theory, and Keepin's group 2 is shown to correspond to primarily two separate isotopes, 137I and 88Br. In the future, it may be useful to use properties of specific isotopes to replace Keepin's delayed neutron groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 for prescribing delayed neutron data for actinides.