ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
K. S. Smith
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 81 | Number 3 | July 1982 | Pages 451-458
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A20286
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An investigation of first-order perturbation (FOP) methods for computing sample worths has been performed. It is demonstrated that conventional cell homogenization methods introduce errors into FOP reactivity calculations because the intracell structure of adjoint fluxes is neglected. These errors are such that the conventional FOP reactivity expression is not accurate to first order, even in the limit of infinitesimal perturbations. A method for avoiding such approximations is introduced and applied to the calculation of small sample worths in plate-type fast reactor critical assemblies. It is demonstrated that errors introduced by real flux weighting of cross sections are such that homogenized FOP reactivity calculations overestimate fissile material worths in several critical assemblies by 5 to 10%. It is shown that these errors arise because of the heterogeneous nature of plate-type critical assemblies, and when appropriate reactivity calculations (which account for spatial heterogeneity of adjoint fluxes) are performed, a significant fraction of the long-standing central worth discrepancy is eliminated.