ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
W. E. Loewe, E. Mendelsohn
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 81 | Number 3 | July 1982 | Pages 325-350
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A20278
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We report the basis for new estimates of “free-in-air” kermas resulting from the nuclear explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki for ground ranges out to 2 km. The results are substantially different from previously accepted values known as T65D, particularly for Hiroshima. The methodology used in our study is different from that of T65D. To obtain prompt neutron and gamma-ray kermas, calculated leakage spectra were utilized that had been generated by modern weapons design codes. These leakage spectra were used as sources in radiation transport calculations performed with extensively validated modern transport codes. We have further cross-checked our calculational results in one and two dimensions, and by using very different solution techniques. For delayed gamma rays, we used a formalism based on the results of atmospheric testing. Our results have been compared with Japanese in situ measurements of neutron activation and of gamma-ray kerma, and found to show good agreement with them. We have explained the major differences between the T65D values and our own, as well as between neutron kermas inferred from the in situ activations and our kerma values. These new results merit confidence. However, improvements in these estimates can occur when additional work is done. One application of practical importance to radiological protection standards has already been made.