ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
W. E. Loewe, E. Mendelsohn
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 81 | Number 3 | July 1982 | Pages 325-350
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A20278
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We report the basis for new estimates of “free-in-air” kermas resulting from the nuclear explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki for ground ranges out to 2 km. The results are substantially different from previously accepted values known as T65D, particularly for Hiroshima. The methodology used in our study is different from that of T65D. To obtain prompt neutron and gamma-ray kermas, calculated leakage spectra were utilized that had been generated by modern weapons design codes. These leakage spectra were used as sources in radiation transport calculations performed with extensively validated modern transport codes. We have further cross-checked our calculational results in one and two dimensions, and by using very different solution techniques. For delayed gamma rays, we used a formalism based on the results of atmospheric testing. Our results have been compared with Japanese in situ measurements of neutron activation and of gamma-ray kerma, and found to show good agreement with them. We have explained the major differences between the T65D values and our own, as well as between neutron kermas inferred from the in situ activations and our kerma values. These new results merit confidence. However, improvements in these estimates can occur when additional work is done. One application of practical importance to radiological protection standards has already been made.