ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
S. R. Bierman, K. L. Garlid and R. W. Albrecht
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 22 | Number 2 | June 1965 | Pages 206-214
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A20239
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The complementary nature of pulsed-neutron and reactor-noise techniques in the investigation of reactor dynamic parameters is illuminated by considering the response of a reactor to two types of forcing functions. One of these forcing functions is the impulse function employed in pulsed-neutron studies, while the other is derivable from the inherent randomness of the nuclear events taking place in the reactor. Both the prompt-neutron density following a burst of neutrons into a reactor system and the spectral density of the reactor noise can be expressed in terms of the prompt-neutron decay constant, α. This, in turn, is related to the ratio β/ℓ and the reactivity of the system. Either technique can be used to measure α; however, in practice, each is limited according to a ‘figure of merit’ for a given experimental situation. Measurements made on both subcritical and critical assemblies in the Critical Mass Laboratory at Hanford illustrate the complementary feature of these two techniques and their usefulness in verifying each other's experimental results.