ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
R. A. Karam, K. D. Dance, T. Nakamura, J. E. Marshall
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 40 | Number 3 | June 1970 | Pages 414-423
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A20193
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An integral transport method was developed and applied to the calculation of the central reactivity worths of various samples measured in a 2700-liter uranium-carbide fast core and in a 4000-liter UO2 fast core. The method was used to obtain corrections to multigroup first-order perturbation calculations, incorporating self-shielding effects inside and outside the sample, as well as scattering, fission, and edge-effect perturbations. Resonance interaction between a 238U sample and the 238U in the core as well as resonance self-shielding in the sample itself were explicitly considered. A similar treatment was used for 235U samples. ENDF/B data were used in all of the analyses. The calculated central worths of 10B and tantalum were in very good agreement with the measured values, indicating that the calculated value of βeff used to convert percent Δk/k to period measurements was reasonably accurate. The calculated worths of 235U were 5 to 10% greater than the measured values. The discrepancy between the calculated and measured values for 238U was 15 to 20%. The discrepancy for graphite in particular and scatterers in general was rather large, indicating that the distribution of the adjoint function is not adequately calculated.