ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
Y. Y. Chang, S. K. Loyalka, D. H. Timmons
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 70 | Number 3 | June 1979 | Pages 313-315
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE79-A20154
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A modified version of the LASER computer code is constructed by using Gear's method for isotopic burnup calculations. It is noted that the original version of the LASER code (as supplied recently by the Argonne Computer Code Center) errs in computation of 241Pu concentration due to a minor programming oversight. This error is corrected, and it is found that the corrected LASER and the modified LASER provide results that agree quite well. For the same calculations, the modified LASER requires only two-thirds the central processor unit time compared to the original (corrected) LASER (on an IBM 370/158). Also, the modified LASER has simpler and more general provisions for handling burnup calculations.
