ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Oren A. Wasson, Michael M. Meier, Kenneth C. Duvall
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 81 | Number 2 | June 1982 | Pages 196-212
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A20085
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The absolute 235U neutron-induced fission cross section has been measured at the U.S. National Bureau of Standards (NBS) 3-MV Van de Graaff Laboratory from 0.2- to 1.2-MeV neutron energy. The mass of the 235U contained in a large volume multiplated fission ionization chamber was measured relative to the NBS fissionable isotope mass standards. Pulsed beam time-of-flight techniques were used with neutrons from the 7Li(p, n)7 Be reaction while the neutron flux was monitored with a large plastic scintillator whose efficiency was both calculated and measured with the associated-particle technique. The cross sections, which were measured with a typical uncertainty of 2.3%, are ∼2% lower than the ENDF/B-V evaluation.