ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
Jeng-Ming Fang, Yen-Wan H. Liu, Horng-Kuang Liu, Pin-Wu Kao, Jing-Tong Yang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 116 | Number 3 | March 1994 | Pages 181-204
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE94-A19812
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A two-dimensional perturbation method with regionwise flux expansion is developed and tested for the boiling water reactor fast shutdown margin calculation. The ways of generating the two-dimensional parameters for the unrodded bundles are tested to find the one that results in the most accurate eigenvalue of the single-rod-out condition. The use of the one-bundle-per-region flux expansion method gives more accurate results than the ring-regionwise flux expansion method. The first four strongest control rods chosen by this method using one-bundle-per-region flux expansion always contain the top four strongest rods predicted by SIMULATE-3 three-dimensional calculations. The strongest rod is always correctly predicted, and the differences in shutdown margin predictions are <1 mk for all the cases tested. The time saved by using the two-dimensional perturbation method rather than the direct three-dimensional full-core calculation is a factor of ∼10 and even more for larger core loadings. By using correct two-dimensional parameters, the accuracies of the perturbation method itself in the calculations of the eigenvalue and the neutron flux distribution are also tested. It is found that the errors are very small even for such a strong perturbation in the shutdown margin calculation.