ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Harry J. Reilly, John D. Hansell, George L. Heath
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 38 | Number 2 | November 1969 | Pages 135-142
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE69-A19518
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method of performing probability calculations for nuclear-reactor surface temperatures has been devised. The method gives consideration to the fact that some uncertainties may vary systematically over all the reactor or over some parts of it. The method does not depend on assumption of any particular form of the probability distributions. The method was used to do an example calculation for an MTR-type test reactor with plate-type fuel elements. It was shown that the calculated probability of failure, that is, that surface temperature exceeds coolant saturation temperature, lies closer to values obtained from the Deterministic Method than to values from the Statistical Method. The calculated probability value was identified as the probability of success at the instant of reactor startup. It was observed that the probability of success for continued operation might not be the same as the value for startup. The method gives an improved representation of the probability problem for reactor surface temperatures. However, there is still much to be learned about the various important distribution functions. In the present situation of inadequate knowledge of behavior and distributions of uncertainty factors, all such probability calculations must be regarded as providing only a rough approximation to the true probability of success for a reactor.