ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
K. Ueki
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 79 | Number 3 | November 1981 | Pages 253-264
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE81-A19402
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two three-dimensional neutron streaming problems are analyzed by using the Monte Carlo coupling technique. One is streaming through a two-legged cylindrical-annular duct and the other is streaming through a slit. The main advantage of breaking the problem into two Monte Carlo calculations is that it is then not necessary to repeat the calculation of neutron transport from the reactor to the pseudo-detector when the duct or the slit configuration is changed. The coupling technique provides a remarkable improvement in both the calculated results and the fractional standard deviations as compared with usual Monte Carlo calculations. The agreement between the measured reaction rates and the calculated values is quite satisfactory. The calculated values using the coupling technique agree with the measured values within a factor of 2 for In(n,n′) and Ni(n,p) threshold detectors in the two-legged cylindrical-annular-duct problem, and agree within a factor of 3 with results from cadmium-covered gold activation detectors and from In(n,n′), Ni(n,p), and S(n,p) threshold detectors in the slit problem. However, there is a relatively large discrepancy between the calculated and the measured values from the cadmium-covered gold activation detector in the cylindrical-annular-duct problem.