ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
P. Azzoni, V. Benzi, A. Salomoni, P. L. Chiodi, C. Giuliani, R. Marvasi, S. Guardini, S. Tassan
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 76 | Number 1 | October 1980 | Pages 70-77
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE80-A19297
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experimental determinations of capture rates of structural materials used in fast breeder reactors, such as iron, chromium, nickel, and stainless steel, normalized to the 235U fission rate, were performed. The aim of these experiments was to check structural material multigroup cross-section libraries in the 1- to 100-keV range, where substantial discrepancies among various cross-section evaluations are not yet resolved. The experiments were carried out in an ARGONAUT-type RB-2 reactor, using the Null Reactivity Oscillation method, on test media composed of quasi-homogeneous loose particle mixtures. Comparisons were carried out with corresponding calculated values, showing a trend of these values to overestimate the measured quantities. Furthermore, evaluations of and of of 235U were made in the same intermediate spectrum. These results are not in disagreement with the indications of recent 235U cross-section measurements as far as the σc/σf of 235U is concerned.