ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
April 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear Energy Strategy announced at CNA2026
At the Canadian Nuclear Association Conference (CNA2026) in Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson announced that Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is developing a new Nuclear Energy Strategy for the country. The strategy, which is slated to be released by the end of this year, will be based on four objectives: 1) enabling new nuclear builds across Canada, 2) being a global supplier and exporter of nuclear technology and services, 3) expanding uranium production and nuclear fuel opportunities, and 4) developing new Canadian nuclear innovations, including in both fission and fusion technologies.
R. L. French
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 23 | Number 1 | September 1965 | Pages 28-33
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A19256
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To perform fast-neutron penetration calculations, a new method is described, which offers some of the advantages of the Monte Carlo method and other highly sophisticated methods, yet retains some of the features of the line-of-sight kernel methods. The method includes the use of effective flux-removal cross sections to predict a distribution of ‘last-collision’ centers in a shield and uses statistical estimation to obtain the flux at the receiver from each last collision. The chief advantage of the method is that it provides an approximate angular distribution of the neutron flux at the receiver and includes the effects of boundaries, but is much less costly to apply than Monte Carlo. The principal limitation to the accuracy of the method stems from the assumption of no change in neutron direction and energy prior to the last collision. Detailed formulations for slab and for cylindrical geometries are given, along with results of an initial evaluation based on comparisons with Monte Carlo and with measured data for lithium hydride shields.