ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
R. L. French
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 23 | Number 1 | September 1965 | Pages 28-33
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A19256
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To perform fast-neutron penetration calculations, a new method is described, which offers some of the advantages of the Monte Carlo method and other highly sophisticated methods, yet retains some of the features of the line-of-sight kernel methods. The method includes the use of effective flux-removal cross sections to predict a distribution of ‘last-collision’ centers in a shield and uses statistical estimation to obtain the flux at the receiver from each last collision. The chief advantage of the method is that it provides an approximate angular distribution of the neutron flux at the receiver and includes the effects of boundaries, but is much less costly to apply than Monte Carlo. The principal limitation to the accuracy of the method stems from the assumption of no change in neutron direction and energy prior to the last collision. Detailed formulations for slab and for cylindrical geometries are given, along with results of an initial evaluation based on comparisons with Monte Carlo and with measured data for lithium hydride shields.