ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
A. Radkowsky, A. Dayan, A. Y. Temkin, L. Green
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 75 | Number 3 | September 1980 | Pages 265-274
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE80-A19058
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The optimum 235U enrichment of the uranium fuel for a once-through cycle for pressurized water reactors (PWRs) is ∼20%. Such an enrichment leads to a core design having the following major advantages in safety, economy, and uranium utilization over present standard designs. 1. There is a reduction in core volume by about a factor of 2, resulting in important savings in costs of core and pressure vessel. 2. Safety will be enhanced as a result of utilization of metallic fuel elements with much greater strength and a factor of 10 better heat conduction and less stored energy than standard ceramic fuel elements. The maximum temperature is 700°F below melting, as compared with 300°F for ceramic fuel. 3. Plutonium discharge is reduced by about a factor of 7. 4. Need for a soluble neutron-absorber control is eliminated. 5. While a detailed core design was beyond the scope of this work, a relatively simple fuel management scheme appears to be feasible which would reduce initial uranium ore requirements by ∼50% of that of standard PWRs and separative work by ∼35% reduce annual usage of uranium ore by ∼15% with a slight increase in separative work.