ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC proposes changes to its rules on nuclear materials
In response to Executive Order 14300, “Ordering the Reform of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,” the NRC is proposing sweeping changes to its rules governing the use of nuclear materials that are widely used in industry, medicine, and research. The changes would amend NRC regulations for the licensing of nuclear byproduct material, some source material, and some special nuclear material.
As published in the May 18 Federal Register, the NRC is seeking public comment on this proposed rule and draft interim guidance until July 2.
A. Radkowsky, A. Dayan, A. Y. Temkin, L. Green
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 75 | Number 3 | September 1980 | Pages 265-274
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE80-A19058
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The optimum 235U enrichment of the uranium fuel for a once-through cycle for pressurized water reactors (PWRs) is ∼20%. Such an enrichment leads to a core design having the following major advantages in safety, economy, and uranium utilization over present standard designs. 1. There is a reduction in core volume by about a factor of 2, resulting in important savings in costs of core and pressure vessel. 2. Safety will be enhanced as a result of utilization of metallic fuel elements with much greater strength and a factor of 10 better heat conduction and less stored energy than standard ceramic fuel elements. The maximum temperature is 700°F below melting, as compared with 300°F for ceramic fuel. 3. Plutonium discharge is reduced by about a factor of 7. 4. Need for a soluble neutron-absorber control is eliminated. 5. While a detailed core design was beyond the scope of this work, a relatively simple fuel management scheme appears to be feasible which would reduce initial uranium ore requirements by ∼50% of that of standard PWRs and separative work by ∼35% reduce annual usage of uranium ore by ∼15% with a slight increase in separative work.