ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
F. C. Difilippo, P. J. Otaduy
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 75 | Number 3 | September 1980 | Pages 258-264
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE80-A19057
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A numerical model of the neutron noise field in boiling water reactors (BWRs), which can be readily implemented in existing deterministic computer codes, was formulated. The basis of the model is the assumption of separability of the noise field into local and global components. The application of this modeling was twofold: to determine the frequency range above which cross-correlation techniques can be used to measure steam velocities under normal operating conditions and to evaluate the validity of the point kinetics description of the global component of the neutron noise in BWRs. The model was implemented in the code LAPUR-3 and applied to the Hatch-1 BWR nuclear plant. Comparison with experimental results shows good agreement for frequencies above 6 Hz. At lower frequencies the global noise is overestimated, making apparent the limitation of the point kinetics formulation of the global noise component for this large reactor.