ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
R. R. Spencer, R. Gwin, R. Ingle
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 80 | Number 4 | April 1982 | Pages 603-629
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A18973
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Oak Ridge National Laboratory large liquid-scintillator detector was used in a precise determination of p, the number of neutrons emitted promptly, from spontaneous fission of 252Cf. Measurements of the detector efficiency over a broad energy region were made by means of a proton-recoil technique employing the Oak Ridge Electron Linear Accelerator “white” neutron source. Monte Carlo calculation of the detector efficiency for a spectrum representative of 252Cf fission neutrons was calibrated with these elaborate measurements. The unusually flat response of the neutron detector resulted in elimination of several known sources of error. Experimental measurement was coupled with calculational methods to correct for other known errors. These measurements lead to an unusually small estimated uncertainty of 0.2% in the value obtained, p = 3.773 ± 0.007.