ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Westinghouse, Nordion, and PSEG team up to produce Co‑60 in the United States
This past January, Westinghouse Electric Company, Nordion, and PSEG Nuclear formalized agreements to implement newly developed cobalt-60 production technology at Units 1 and 2 of PSEG’s Salem nuclear power plant in New Jersey, with the Co-60 to be supplied to Nordion. Through an ongoing joint initiative, the companies aim to harness U.S. pressurized water reactors to produce a key medical isotope and build the first commercial-scale Co-60 production platform in the United States.
Kiyoshi Takeuchi, Nobuo Sasamoto
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 80 | Number 4 | April 1982 | Pages 536-553
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A18968
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A complete theory of a direct integration method for solving the steady-state integral transport equation in general geometry is presented together with special techniques for an accurate treatment of monoenergetic radiation source and for mitigation of the ray effect. Emphasis is on several characteristic features, which make the method well adapted to shielding calculations, such as an exact treatment of anisotropic scattering by applying the Klein-Nishina formula for Compton scattering and the differential scattering cross section itself for neutron elastic scattering, analytical integration of the flux term and also direct integration of the source term over the spatial variable in the radiation moving direction, the absence of iterative calculations for obtaining the group angular flux but, instead, applying the point-energy calculation, and optional use of an analytical unscattered flux calculation for mitigating the ray effects. For verifying the validity of the present method, several comparisons of the calculations are presented using the one- and the two-dimensional codes, PALLAS-PL, SP-Br and PALLAS-2DCY-FC, with the experiments adopted as shielding benchmark problems. Fairly good agreement is obtained between PALLAS calculations and experiments on the gamma-ray angular flux spectra at several angles as well as the energy spectra at two and three mean-free-paths in water. For neutron streaming through a cylindrical duct and also an annular duct, PALLAS calculations are in fairly good agreement with experiments in terms of the reaction rate except for thermal neutrons, where an obvious underestimation is obtained. For neutron deep penetration in an iron shield, selected for examining the weakest point of the method, a PALLAS calculation is found to be adequate for shielding design calculations, though some discrepancy is seen between calculation and experiment on neutron energy spectra at 20- and 30-in. depths.