ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
A. Hawighorst, H. Kröning, F. Mayinger
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 88 | Number 3 | November 1984 | Pages 376-385
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE84-A18591
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
At an unhealed 4 × 4 rod bundle air/water test facility, optical investigations of the entrainment behavior and countercurrent flow experiments were performed under a large variety of test conditions: flow duct geometry; internals (tie plate, bundle length, number of grid spacers, rod diameter); type of injection (different nozzles, porous sinter metal) different mass flux for air and water. In addition, several flooding models were compared with experimental data. It was found that the type of injection has only a weak influence, whereas the geometric conditions upstream of the narrowest flow area (presence of bundle and grid spacer) have an important effect on the flooding behavior. In addition, a comparison of the applicability of different flooding models shows that only the models based on dimensionless numbers expressed by superficial velocities show a good agreement with experimental data.