ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
S. Kaplan and J. B. Yasinsky
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 25 | Number 4 | August 1966 | Pages 430-438
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A18565
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The physical question of the spatial stability of a reactor with respect to xenon oscillations corresponds to a mathematical question regarding the location in the complex plane of the roots of a certain eigenvalue problem. The introduction of feedback controllers corresponds to the imposition of constraints on the eigenvalue problem. The effect of certain such constraints on the locations of the eigenvalues is examined in this paper for the idealized case of a one-group uniform-ring reactor. It is found that the eigenvalues obey a rule related to Rayleigh's separation theorem for vibrating mechanical systems. A numerical example is given in which the solutions of the constrained eigenproblem are displayed, interpreted physically, and compared with those of the unconstrained problem.