ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Hidemasa Kato, Tohru Haga, Shigeru Ohteru, Hiroshi Kamikawa
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 87 | Number 4 | August 1984 | Pages 361-380
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE84-A18505
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A core management analysis of a 165-MW(electric) plutonium-uranium mixed-oxide-fueled heavy water reactor, Fugen, has been carried out and compared with some of the operational data through the initial cycle and three reload cycles. During these burnup cycles, the Fugen reactor has experienced refueling of 72 plutonium-uranium fuel bundles and 76 UO2 fuel bundles, including four special bundles for irradiating test samples. The core burnup, thermal flux distribution, power distribution, coolant flow distribution, etc., were calculated and compared with measurements. The root-mean-square (rms) error of the calculated thermal flux over the three-dimensional spatial nodes was found to be ∼3% for various core conditions, and the rms error of the calculated core flow distribution was within 2%. The reload patterns have been chosen in such a way that mixed oxide and UO2 fuel bundles can exist in a mixed bed loading with no attendant reactor control problems.