ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
A. Natarajan, K. V. Subbaiah, D. V. Gopinath
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 85 | Number 4 | December 1983 | Pages 418-422
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE83-A18387
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Significant differences have been observed between Goldstein and Wilkins (moments method) and ASFIT (anisotropic source flux iteration technique) buildup factors in the materials of high atomic number (Z) for 6- and 8-MeV gamma rays at depths greater than 10 mfp. Comparison has been made between the two, and quantitative differences are presented for tin, tungsten, lead, and uranium in the gamma-ray energy range of 3 to 10 MeV up to a depth of 20 mfp. It is believed that these large differences are a sequel to certain deficiencies in the Goldstein and Wilkins method of reconstructing the spatial distribution of the scattered flux in these cases. The closer agreement between the modified moments method values and the present results is cited.