ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
S. G. Bankoff, S. H. Han
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 85 | Number 4 | December 1983 | Pages 387-395
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE83-A18385
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A necessary condition for a large-scale steam explosion in a core meltdown accident in the light water reactor is the formation of a coarsely predispersed mixture of molten “fuel” and water. Chapman-Jouguet diagrams for tin-water mixtures indicate that thermal detonations at supercritical pressures are possible only with relatively low initial void fractions (<0.15). The present calculations deal with a one-dimensional array of fuel particles falling steadily from the lower tie plate into the lower plenum pool. Radiative heat fluxes turn out to be several times larger than the convective fluxes. Both homogeneous and separated flow models for the steam-water flow relative to the particles are formulated. In both cases the void fraction rapidly rises to above 0.85, and the particle volume fraction also decreases sharply, indicating rapid bed dispersal. This confirms a simpler calculation by Henry and Fauske of water removal from the heating zone, looked upon as a subcooled critical heat flux calculation. It would therefore appear to be very difficult to have an efficient steam explosion on a scale large enough to threaten the containment.