ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
R. E. Maerker, M. L. Williams, B. L. Broadhead
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 94 | Number 4 | December 1986 | Pages 291-308
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE86-A18342
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A technique is described to account for effects of space- and time-dependent core source variations on pressure vessel surveillance dosimetry analysis. The procedure first defines an easily implemented geometry for a single adjoint transport calculation. The results from the adjoint calculation can then be combined with those from a single forward calculation, in conjunction with an adjoint scaling technique, to yield activities and pressure vessel fluxes simultaneously for a wide range of source distributions, dosimeter response functions, and detector locations. This method has been implemented in the LEPRICON code system for vessel fluence determination. An application to an R-θ model of an operating power reactor shows that effects of source perturbations resulting in 20% changes in the core leakage can be predicted within ∼3% at both downcomer and cavity dosimeter locations, for six different dosimeters, by choice of a single suitable adjoint response function.