ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
April 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear Energy Strategy announced at CNA2026
At the Canadian Nuclear Association Conference (CNA2026) in Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson announced that Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is developing a new Nuclear Energy Strategy for the country. The strategy, which is slated to be released by the end of this year, will be based on four objectives: 1) enabling new nuclear builds across Canada, 2) being a global supplier and exporter of nuclear technology and services, 3) expanding uranium production and nuclear fuel opportunities, and 4) developing new Canadian nuclear innovations, including in both fission and fusion technologies.
Dominic J. Raso and Stanley Woolf
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 27 | Number 2 | February 1967 | Pages 252-264
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE67-A18265
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Calculations were performed by the Monte Carlo method to determine the dose at various detector locations behind a vertical barrier and below an adjacent horizontal barrier. Results were obtained, using two different Monte Carlo approaches, for a 1.25-MeV simulated ground source incident on 60, 40, and 20 psf of concrete. The results of the Monte Carlo calculations were used to calculate reduction factors. The above-ground reduction factors compared with those of Spencer to within 10%. The below-ground reduction factors were compared with those calculated from the OCD Engineering Manual, and the agreement in this case was found to be unsatisfactory. In some instances, discrepancies were found to be as high as a factor of 3. For the case of the open basement, agreement among the three methods was found to lie within 10 to 20%. The results obtained by the two Monte Carlo methods used were found to be in excellent agreement. These results also compared to within 10 to 15% with results of experiments performed at Technical Operations Research. The results indicate that further investigation is necessary to determine the amount of scattered radiation within a basement.