ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
3D-printed tool at SRS makes quicker work of tank waste sampling
A 3D-printed tool has been developed at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina that can eliminate months from the job of radioactive tank waste sampling.
Dominic J. Raso and Stanley Woolf
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 27 | Number 2 | February 1967 | Pages 252-264
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE67-A18265
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Calculations were performed by the Monte Carlo method to determine the dose at various detector locations behind a vertical barrier and below an adjacent horizontal barrier. Results were obtained, using two different Monte Carlo approaches, for a 1.25-MeV simulated ground source incident on 60, 40, and 20 psf of concrete. The results of the Monte Carlo calculations were used to calculate reduction factors. The above-ground reduction factors compared with those of Spencer to within 10%. The below-ground reduction factors were compared with those calculated from the OCD Engineering Manual, and the agreement in this case was found to be unsatisfactory. In some instances, discrepancies were found to be as high as a factor of 3. For the case of the open basement, agreement among the three methods was found to lie within 10 to 20%. The results obtained by the two Monte Carlo methods used were found to be in excellent agreement. These results also compared to within 10 to 15% with results of experiments performed at Technical Operations Research. The results indicate that further investigation is necessary to determine the amount of scattered radiation within a basement.