ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
April 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear Energy Strategy announced at CNA2026
At the Canadian Nuclear Association Conference (CNA2026) in Ottawa, Ontario, on April 29, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson announced that Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) is developing a new Nuclear Energy Strategy for the country. The strategy, which is slated to be released by the end of this year, will be based on four objectives: 1) enabling new nuclear builds across Canada, 2) being a global supplier and exporter of nuclear technology and services, 3) expanding uranium production and nuclear fuel opportunities, and 4) developing new Canadian nuclear innovations, including in both fission and fusion technologies.
William G. Davey
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 24 | Number 1 | January 1966 | Pages 26-41
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A18121
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A new activation technique has been developed for the measurement of the ratio of the capture cross section of 238U and the fission cross section of 235U in zero-energy fast reactors. This work was initiated because of the long-standing discrepancy between calculated values of this ratio and radio-chemically measured values. The new technique is a direct counting method that does not involve chemical separation in any way. Measurements have been made in four Z PR-III fast reactor assemblies, two with hard spectra and two with soft spectra. In all four cases the measured ratio was slightly higher than the calculated value being, on the average, 4% higher than calculation. This is in strong contrast with the past radiochemical measurements in Z PR-U3 assemblies that gave values 16% less than calculation. The present measurements, therefore, support the general correctness of the calculated ratio and, hence, indicate that there are no gross errors in the assumed average microscopic values of the 238U capture cross section and the 235 U fission cross section.