ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
H. L. Brown, Jr., T. J. Connolly
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 24 | Number 1 | January 1966 | Pages 6-17
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A18119
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method for calculating effective cadmium cutoff energies to be applied to measured resonance integrals of Doppler-broadened-resonance absorbers, as well as l/υ absorbers, is described. The method is applied to infinite slab, infinite cylinder, and sphere configurations in which the absorber, at some uniform concentration, occupies all the space within the cadmium cover. It is pointed out that the effective cutoff value applying to an activation measurement of a resonance integral differs from that applying to a reactivity measurement under otherwise identical conditions. The development of calculations for both cases is presented. Some results are given for gold, indium-115, plutonium-240, and the l/υ absorbers, boron and vanadium, as a function of sample configuration, cadmium thickness, absorber density, temperature, and neutron spectrum. Many of these values differ significantly from the nominal 0.5 eV.