ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
H. L. Brown, Jr., T. J. Connolly
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 24 | Number 1 | January 1966 | Pages 6-17
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A18119
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method for calculating effective cadmium cutoff energies to be applied to measured resonance integrals of Doppler-broadened-resonance absorbers, as well as l/υ absorbers, is described. The method is applied to infinite slab, infinite cylinder, and sphere configurations in which the absorber, at some uniform concentration, occupies all the space within the cadmium cover. It is pointed out that the effective cutoff value applying to an activation measurement of a resonance integral differs from that applying to a reactivity measurement under otherwise identical conditions. The development of calculations for both cases is presented. Some results are given for gold, indium-115, plutonium-240, and the l/υ absorbers, boron and vanadium, as a function of sample configuration, cadmium thickness, absorber density, temperature, and neutron spectrum. Many of these values differ significantly from the nominal 0.5 eV.