ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Front-end nuclear fuel supply cooperation: Turning allied interdependence into strategic advantage
The global nuclear revival, which is fueled by unprecedented demand for firm, affordable, dispatchable power for artificial intelligence and data center build-out, energy security imperatives, and climate commitments, has exposed a structural reality of the Western fuel cycle: No single allied nation currently possesses the full suite of front-end capabilities. From mining through conversion, enrichment, fabrication, and the emerging deconversion and metallization steps required for reactor fuels, capability is distributed across Canada, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States (collectively, the “Sapporo Five”), as well as a small group of close partners.
J. D. Teachman, R. J. Onega
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 83 | Number 1 | January 1983 | Pages 149-161
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE83-A17996
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A nonlinear model is developed for the xenon-induced flux oscillation problem that occurs in nuclear power plants. The model is based on Galerkin's method of weighted residuals applied to multigroup diffusion theory. A similar linear model is developed by the same methods in order to consider the effects of the nonlinearities of the system. The effects of multi- and single-energy group considerations are also examined. The one- and three-energy group models give substantial differences in results for a 0.25% perturbation in the absorption cross section in various regions of the core. The effect of the number of profiles describing the flux distribution has an effect on the accuracy of the simulation. The minimum number of profiles is one higher than the number of regions into which the reactor is divided for a one-dimensional calculation. The use of additional profiles causes a small increase in the accuracy of the results at the expense of a dramatic increase in computational time.