ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
F. C. Difilippo, J. P. Renier, B. A. Worley
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 124 | Number 3 | November 1996 | Pages 465-472
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-A17924
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Calculations related to the temperature coefficient of reactivity of enriched gas-cooled reactors show the high sensitivity of this parameter to the proper description of thermalization effects in the moderator. Additionally, the calculation of the temperature dependence of the inelastic-scattering cross section with current ENDF/B formalisms correlates the errors of the cross sections as functions of the temperature. Neglecting this temperature correlation introduces unnecessary conservatism in the estimation of the error of the reactivity coefficient.These two facts drove our efforts to characterize the present status of the inelastic cross section of graphite and to calculate its covariance file. The ENDF/B evaluation of the scattering matrix S(α, β, T) is still based on the approximations (incoherent component only) andphonon spectra of the early 1960s. Subsequent measurements showed that the structure observed in S(α, β, T) cannot be described using the incoherent approximation, and soon after the availability of highly intense neutron beams and large specimens of pyrolitic graphite have allowed the direct measurement of elastic constants of relevance for a better calculation of the phonon spectra. Calculations of the probability distributions of the moment and energy transfer, a and β, in a Maxwellian spectrum allow us to define a range of α and β for which comparison of experimental and theoretical data are of most interest for reactor analysis, and to point out regions of deficient resolution or excessive details in the present α, β mesh used in the ENDF/B files. Because the phonon spectrum defines S(α, β, T), mathematical formulas have been found that allow the calculation of the covariance matrix of S by propagating the errors of the phonon spectra.