ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Westinghouse, Nordion, and PSEG team up to produce Co‑60 in the United States
This past January, Westinghouse Electric Company, Nordion, and PSEG Nuclear formalized agreements to implement newly developed cobalt-60 production technology at Units 1 and 2 of PSEG’s Salem nuclear power plant in New Jersey, with the Co-60 to be supplied to Nordion. Through an ongoing joint initiative, the companies aim to harness U.S. pressurized water reactors to produce a key medical isotope and build the first commercial-scale Co-60 production platform in the United States.
Temitope A. Taiwo, A. F. Henry
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 92 | Number 1 | January 1986 | Pages 34-41
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE86-A17862
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The standard point kinetics equations and formally exact expressions for reactivity, prompt neutron lifetime, and effective delayed neutron fractions are derived from the matrix form of the nodal code QUANDRY. Perturbation theory expressions for reactivity based both on the standard quadratic-transverse-leakage form of QUANDRY and on the coarse-mesh finite difference (CMFD) form, made accurate by the use of discontinuity factors, are derived. With three-dimensional CMFD QUANDRY transient calculations taken as numerical standards, the accuracy of several standard point kinetics methods as well as the improved quasi-static method is tested. Results suggest that point kinetics methods are poor for rod ejection calculations, even if a precalculated table of rod worth versus position is used to infer the reactivity contribution of the moving rods. For transients not involving rod motion, the point kinetics equations are more accurate. Use of core-averaged (rather than node-dependent) temperature coefficients, however, can produce significant errors. The quasistatic scheme appears to yield acceptably accurate results but, for the tests run, consistently required more computing time than needed for the full three-dimensional solutions.