ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
Temitope A. Taiwo, A. F. Henry
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 92 | Number 1 | January 1986 | Pages 34-41
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE86-A17862
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The standard point kinetics equations and formally exact expressions for reactivity, prompt neutron lifetime, and effective delayed neutron fractions are derived from the matrix form of the nodal code QUANDRY. Perturbation theory expressions for reactivity based both on the standard quadratic-transverse-leakage form of QUANDRY and on the coarse-mesh finite difference (CMFD) form, made accurate by the use of discontinuity factors, are derived. With three-dimensional CMFD QUANDRY transient calculations taken as numerical standards, the accuracy of several standard point kinetics methods as well as the improved quasi-static method is tested. Results suggest that point kinetics methods are poor for rod ejection calculations, even if a precalculated table of rod worth versus position is used to infer the reactivity contribution of the moving rods. For transients not involving rod motion, the point kinetics equations are more accurate. Use of core-averaged (rather than node-dependent) temperature coefficients, however, can produce significant errors. The quasistatic scheme appears to yield acceptably accurate results but, for the tests run, consistently required more computing time than needed for the full three-dimensional solutions.