ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE announces NEPA exclusion for advanced reactors
The Department of Energy has announced that it is establishing a categorical exclusion for the application of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures to the authorization, siting, construction, operation, reauthorization, and decommissioning of advanced nuclear reactors.
According to the DOE, this significant change, which goes into effect today, “is based on the experience of DOE and other federal agencies, current technologies, regulatory requirements, and accepted industry practice.”
J. Hirota, M. Nakano, S. Iijima, K. Shirakata
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 87 | Number 3 | July 1984 | Pages 252-261
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE84-A17781
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An experimental study of the heterogeneous liquid-metal fast breeder reactor core has been made using FCA VII-3 assemblies of an axially heterogeneous configuration. The internal blankets inserted in these assemblies differed in composition, arrangement, and thickness. The analysis was carried out using the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Fast Set Version II and the diffusion code in R-Z geometry. The S4 calculation was made to evaluate the transport effects. Comparison between the calculated and experimental results reveals that the eigenvalue and the plutonium sample worth in the core are underestimated for the heterogeneous assembly, although they are well represented for the homogeneous assembly. The 238U capture rate is underestimated in the internal blanket relative to the core of the heterogeneous assembly. Further study is needed to solve the inconsistent prediction of the sodium-void worth observed between the heterogeneous and homogeneous assemblies.