ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
Richard E. Turley
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 30 | Number 2 | November 1967 | Pages 166-175
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE67-A17327
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents an operator-type perturbation method which may be used to solve perturbation problems associated with the neutron diffusion equation. The method is related to the hybrid Schrodinger-Heisenberg operator methods used in quantum mechanics. The operators are derived from the variational principles associated with the neutron diffusion equation; therefore, the method includes the advantages of the variational method. Two applications in one-dimensional, one-group diffusion theory are illustrated. The first example illustrates how a plane source of neutrons can be treated as a perturbation. The solution to this problem is exact. In the second example, the solution to a simplified time-independent problem involving fission-product poisoning is presented. The solution to this example is in open form as expected. It is found by way of comparison that this operator method gives a better result in this particular example than the more familiar method of approximating the perturbed solution by an expansion in terms of eigenfunctions of the unperturbed solution.